Let's just get the obvious out of the way, yes, I haven't blogged since July. I've had a lot going on with family issues that left very little time for outside interest. (i.e. this blog) with that out of the way, lets talk about something that happened Friday.
Friday September 12th, 2008 at 4:24pm Metrolink had the worst accident they've ever had in their 16 year history. 25 people have died. The previous worst accident was in January 26th, 2005. This accident from 2005 is still with me. As I
lost a friend in that accident.
I must also mention that I ride Metrolink everyday, and I have since August of 2002. So for over six years, almost everyday during the work week I've ridden the train. My total amount of time spend on trains each day is almost 4 hours with two train transfers. That is approximately 1000 hours on the train a year. Why do I mention this, to show that I know what it's like to be on the train. Unlike all the "reporters" that you've on the extend news cast all Friday evening, Saturday and Sunday.
I have real trouble with their coverage. Every single minute of coverage has tried to make it like the train is the unsafest form of transportation. KABC7 has a poll asking people "Does the Metrolink crash change your view of the safety of mass transit?" 52% said "yes", 41% said no and 6% "not sure". Well I took this little survey and afterward it made me mad, because I realized most of these people that took the "survey" have probably never taken public transportation and have no plans on every taking it. So why are they allowed to vote in this survey? Well they shouldn't be able to, this survey should have only been give to people who have actually taken the train.
Metrolink announced that it appears, I repeat "appears" that the engineer may have missed a red signal. Others have mentioned that he was "texting". I find this suspect. First it's really easy to blame an accident this big on someone that died in the accident. How is the engineer or his family going to be able to defend against this charge. Second the NSTB says that the investigation can take up to one year to complete. So if NSTB isn't willing to commit to an answer, why is Metrolink announcing the "cause" less than 24 hours after the accident. However the Media jumped all over the announcement by Metrolink. Every 30 second news blurps has had this on for the past 48 hours. To add injury to insult , at approximately 5:11pm Friday, September 12th, 2008 on the Corona line a train hit a car killing the driver. Most of the time these incidents aren't reported on the nightly news, but they were sure to mention it this time.
So what is my point? I want to know why is the media demonizing Metrolink and Metrolink engineers so badly. These are the people I have learned to trust to get me to work everyday. I am on a first name basis with several of the conductors. Why are they making me question if I'll be taking the train to work tomorrow? The
U.S. Transportation Department reported that in California alone there were 4,236 highway related fatalities in 2006. So why isn't the media demonizing the car? Ratings and Sponsors pure and simple. Their viewership would go in the toliet and all of there car sponsors would pull out. If they told you the statistics of how dangerous cars are compared to any other mode of transportation. Tomorrow morning when you watch the news as you eat your bowl of Wheaties, just count how many car commercials you see! So they'll never go after the car, but there are big ratings to be had when there is a train accident.
So all that being said, I have nothing against cars. But I do have something against reporters who skew statistics and perceptions for ratings and sponsors. I'm reminded of what Don Henley said in his song Dirty Laundry:
"
We got the bubble-headed-bleach-blonde who
Comes on at five
She can tell you bout the plane crash with a gleam
In her eye
Its interesting when people die-
Give us dirty laundry"